Track Nation Next on Social Media

Uncategorized

Here’s how actor-turned-politicians fared in Lok Sabha Elections 2019

From Left: Sunny Deol, Urmila Matondkar, Ravi Kishan and Mimi Chakraborty

BJP has done the unthinkable. It has become the first party apart from Indian National Congress in the history of independent India to get a clear majority and form government for two consecutive terms. BJP has not only created history, it has also outdone itself. While in Lok Sabha 2014 elections BJP won 272 seats, in Lok Sabha Elections 2019, it has won 303 seats. Among those who contested the 2019 elections, there were also some actor-turned-politicians. Here’s how these actor-turned-politicians fared in the Lok Sabha Elections 2019.

? Smriti Irani from BJP ? 468514 votes

Closest Competitor: Congress President Rahul Gandhi ? 413394 votes

Result: Win

Margin: 55120 votes

Constituency: Amethi from Uttar Pradesh

? Sunny Deol from BJP ? 558719 votes

Closest Competitor: Sunil Kumar Jakhar from Congress ? 476260 votes

Result: Win

Margin: 82459 votes

Constituency: Gurdaspur in Punjab

? Urmila Matondkar from Congress ? 241431 votes

Closest Competitor: Gopal Shetty from BJP ? 706678 votes

Result: Loss

Margin: 465247 votes

Constituency: Mumbai North

? Kirron Kher from BJP ? 231188 votes

Closest Competitor: Pawan Kumar Bansal from Congress ? 184218 votes

Result: Win

Margin: 46970 votes

Constituency: Chandigarh

? Prakash Raj (Independent ) ? 28906 votes

Winner: PC Mohan from BJP ? 602853 votes

Result: Loss

Constituency: Bangalore Central

? Shatrughan Sinha from Congress ? 322849 votes

Closest Competitor: Ravi Shankar Prasad from BJP ? 607506 votes

Result: Loss

Margin: 284657 votes

Constituency: Patna Sahib

? Hema Malini from BJP ? 671293 votes

Closest Competitor: Kunwar Narendra Singh from RLD ? 377822 votes

Result: Win

Margin: 293471 votes

Constituency: Mathura

? Jaya Prada from BJP ? 449180 votes

Closest competitor: Against: Azam Khan from Samajwadi Party ? 559177 votes

Result: Loss

Margin: 109997 votes

Constituency: Rampur in Uttar Pradesh

? Ravi Kishan from BJP ? 717122 votes

Closest Competitor: Rambhual Nishad from Samajwadi Party ? 415458 votes

Result: Win

Margin: 301664 votes

Constituency: Gorakhpur in Uttar Pradesh

? Dinesh Lal Yadav from BJP ? 361704 votes

Closest Competitor: Akhilesh Yadav from Samajwadi Party ? 621578 votes

Result: Loss

Margin: 259874 votes

Constituency: Azamgarh

? Manoj Tiwari from BJP ? 787799 votes

Closest Competitor: Sheila Dikshit from Congress ? 421697 votes

Result: Win

Margin: 366102 votes

Constituency: North East Delhi

Moon Moon Sen from Trinamool Congress ? 435741 votes

Closest Competitor: Babul Surpiyo from BJP ? 633378 votes

Result: Loss

Margin: 197637 votes

Constituency: Asansol

? Mimi Chakraborty from Trinamool Congress ? 688472 votes

Closest Competitor: Anupam Hazra from BJP ? 393233 votes

Result: Win

Margin: 295239 votes

Constituency: Jadavpur in West Bengal

? Nusrat Jahan from Trinamool Congress ? 782078 votes

closest competitor: Sayantan Basu from BJP ? 431709 votes

Result: Win

Margin: 350369 votes

Constituency: Basirhat in West Bengal

? Sumalatha (independent) ? 703660 votes

Closest Competitor: Nikhil Kumarswamy from JD(S) ? 577784 votes

Result: Win

Margin: 125876 votes

Constituency: Mandya in Karnataka

? Innocent Vareed Thekkethala from CPI (M) ? 341170 votes

Closest Competitor: Benny Behanan from Congress ? 4733444 votes

Result: Loss

Margin: 132274 votes

Constituency: Chalakudy in Kerala

Continue Reading
Click to comment
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments

Crime

Rahul Gandhi sentenced to 2 years in jail in Modi surname defamation case

Published

on

By

Radhika Dhawad | Surat

Rahul Gandhi

Surat Court, on Thursday, awarded two-year jail term to Congress MP Rahul Gandhi in a defamation case for his ‘all thieves have Modi surname’ remark. The case was filed against Gandhi for his alleged ‘how come all the thieves have Modi as the common surname?’ remarks on a complaint lodged by BJP MLA and former Gujarat minister Purnesh Modi.

The Court also imposed a fine of ₹15,000 after finding him guilty under Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 499 and 500 (dealing with defamation). However, he secured a bail in the same case. 

Chief Judicial Magistrate HH Verma heard the final arguments regarding Gandhi’s 2019 remark, “Why all the thieves, be it Nirav Modi, Lalit Modi or Narendra Modi have Modi in their names.” Gandhi’s counsel Kirit Panwala said, “We will today send a message to Rahul Gandhi to remain present on March 23 in Surat district court. Most probably, he would be present in the court. We will get confirmation on Saturday.”

Gandhi made the alleged remarks while addressing a rally at Kolar in Karnataka ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections.

Also read: NIA raids Nagpur man’s residence at 4 am for suspected terror links with Zakir Naik

Continue Reading

Crime

BREAKING: Surat Court convicts Rahul Gandhi on Modi surname remark

Published

on

By

Radhika Dhawad | Surat
Surat Court held Congress MP Rahul Gandhi guilty in a defamation case for his 'all thieves have Modi surname' remark.

Rahul Gandhi

Surat Court held Congress MP Rahul Gandhi guilty in a defamation case for his ‘all thieves have Modi surname’ remark. The case was filed against Gandhi for his alleged ‘how come all the thieves have Modi as the common surname?’ remarks on a complaint lodged by BJP MLA and former Gujarat minister Purnesh Modi.

Chief Judicial Magistrate HH Verma heard the final arguments regarding Gandhi’s 2019 remark, “Why all the thieves, be it Nirav Modi, Lalit Modi or Narendra Modi have Modi in their names.” Gandhi’s counsel Kirit Panwala said, “We will today send a message to Rahul Gandhi to remain present on March 23 in Surat district court. Most probably, he would be present in the court. We will get confirmation on Saturday.”

Gandhi had last appeared before the Surat court in the case, filed under Indian Penal Code (IPC) sections 499 and 500 (dealing with defamation), in October 2021 to record his statement. Gandhi made the alleged remarks while addressing a rally at Kolar in Karnataka ahead of the 2019 Lok Sabha elections.

Also read: 900 accidents, 31 deaths in 100 days: Samruddhi Mahamarg still a road to prosperity?

Continue Reading

Governance

900 accidents, 31 deaths in 100 days: Samruddhi Mahamarg still a road to prosperity?

Published

on

By

Radhika Dhawad | Nagpur
With nearly 12,000 vehicles running on Samruddhi Nagpur-Mumbai expressway every day, MSRDC has earned ₹20 cr in the past 1 month.

Samruddhi Mahamarg has witnessed 900 accidents and 31 deaths in 100 days since its inauguration in December last year.

On an average, the Mumbai-Nagpur Expressway, officially known as the Hindu Hriday Samrat Balasaheb Thackeray Samruddhi Mahamarg, has reported one accident in every two days since its inauguration by Prime Minister Narendra Modi in December last year.

Now, it has come to light that there were 900 accidents and 31 deaths in 100 days of its inauguration. The ambitious expressway, which was touted as the ‘road to prosperity’ by PM Modi might be turning into a nightmare or can one say – it has already turned into one?

What’s missing?

With repeated fatalities occurring on the expressway, it’s about time, the The Maharashtra State Road Development Corporation (MSRDC) identifies and fixes the lacunas on priority. Some of the probable loopholes that might have contributed to repeated accidents may include lack of timely medical facilities, highway hypnosis, repeated animal run-overs due to absence of channel fencing, no check for over speeding, bursting of worn-out tyres, absence of ‘vehicle-fitness’ booths at entry and exit points, absence of highway cops and officials of Regional Transport Office (RTO), absence of road reflectors, counselling booths for drivers, emergency car repair centre, no checking of overloaded vehicles, to name a few.

Million dollar dream project turned delight into sheer nightmare 

Moreover, the expressway still lacks basic facilities for the driver like eateries, toilets or even refreshment space, which some have pointed out is one of the many reasons behind hundreds of accidents in just three months.

Despite the absence of any major engineering issues and with limited traffic, the million dollar dream project seems to have turned delight into sheer nightmare for commuters. Also, not much could be assured by the government for women safety on the newly-commissioned expressway so far.

Gadkari’s take

In just 18 days of its inauguration last year, at least 40 accidents on the expressway had occurred that claimed seven lives and left 33 injured. Union Road Transport and Highways Minister Nitin Gadkari recently admitted that the current emergency response system was inadequate and subsequently announced a plan to improve the same.

Gadkari emphasised the state government will ensure ambulances that are equipped with necessary facilities and tools to rescue injured commuters from vehicles along with provision of skilled manpower.

He assured that in case of emergency, an ambulance will reach the location within 20 minutes of receiving a call for help in the control room. He also admitted that the system currently working on the expressway is not as effective as it should be.

Considered as a pet-project of Deputy Chief Minister Devendra Fadnavis, Samruddhi Mahamarg, ahead of its inauguration, had grabbed headlines for the BJP ‘taking Maha Vikas Aghadi’s (MVA) credit’ for the expressway.

Did PM Modi hurriedly inaugurate the expressway? 

However, the project was conceptualised and construction for the same began when Fadnavis was the Chief Minister. Despite several claims by Fadnavis and Maharashtra BJP President Chandrashekhar Bawankule of the BJP implementing the project, the controversy that PM Modi ‘hurriedly’ inaugurated the ‘incomplete expressway’ still continues to simmer in the minds of many.

PM Modi, on December 11, inaugurated the Phase-I of 701km-long six-lane Samruddhi Mahamarg – covering a distance of 520 kms and connecting Nagpur and Shirdi.

Also read: Gadkari again receives death threat calls from same caller

Continue Reading
Advertisement
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x